KATHA UPANISHAD - 60. Swami Advayananda.
Swami Chinmayananda:
What is the meaning and significance of Chinmudra?
========================================================================================
Friday 12, Jul 2024 06:30.
Chapter 1.3:
17 Mantras: THE JOURNEY AHEAD
THE ROUTE OF THE JOURNEY
1.3.10 & 11: The Journey Mapped Out
Post - 60.
========================================================================================
THE ROUTE OF THE JOURNEY
1.3.10 & 11: The Journey Mapped Out
=====================================================================================
|| 1.3.10||
1
Indriyebhyah paraa hi arthaah =Beyond the senses are the sense objects;
2
arthebhyah cha param manah; =beyond these objects is the mind;
3
manasah tu paraa buddhih =beyond the mind is the intellect;
4
buddheh aatmaa mahaan parah = and beyond the intellect is the Great Self.
5
Mahatah param avyaktam =Beyond the great Manifested is the unmanifested;
6
avyaktaat purushah parah; = beyond the unmanifested is the Purusha;
7
purushaat na param kinchit = beyond the Purushah there is nothing;
8
saa kaashthaa saa paraa gatih. = That is the end, That is the highest Goal.
=========================================================================================
Acharyaji assured us that in the entire scriptures, we will not get verses like in this
chapter that bring so much clarity concerning the Sadhana to attain the Self. For that
reason, the Katha Upanishad is highly quoted by preachers and teachers. It is quite unique
for the simple and convincing way in which it brings home to us the essentials of Sadhana.
The Forward & the Return Journeys:
In these two verses, the route is mapped out. How the goal, namely Brahman, is to
be reached is shown from here onwards. Nachiketas can pack his luggage for the trip ahead!
The journey that is to end in his own Self is about to begin! More is said of this journey in
the next verse. Here only the route is given.
When creation begins, it is from Brahman down to the gross manifested world. This
is the forward journey, called Adhyaropa or a theoretical superimposition. It is represented .
The return journey is called Apavada or the intellectual de-superimposition.
This takes us back from the gross to the subtle and then to the causal, until we return to
Brahman. It is represented from Pada 8-1
The Bhashya’s Link: Three Criteria of Subtlety:
At one point in the Bhashya, Shankaracharya, in answering an objection, says that
the journey is not in space, not in an ‘x-y-z axes’ system, but a journey in understanding,
knowing and reaching deeper levels within our Being. It is like a journey made by Earth to
discover its own core. No physical distance needs to be traversed. Earth needs only to
“meditate” on itself, going deeper and subtler till it reaches its own core.
Three criteria are used in the Bhashya to differentiate a lower realm from a higher:
i) Sookshma Taram: Subtlety– the higher is subtler than the lower realm.
ii) Sarva Mahat Taram: Vastness– the higher is potentially more powerful and
inclusive than the lower realm.
iii) Pratyag Atma Bhootam: Immanence– the higher is reached by going deeper and
deeper within; going to the inner core brings us to the next level of subtlety.
From Sense Organs to Sense Objects:
1
At first glance it is normal to think there is a mistake here – that the two levels
have been interchanged. Surely the objects are grosser than the senses? The reason would
be that the senses are made of subtle elements and the objects of gross elements. But Yama
has switched their places. Acharyaji’s first response was to say, “Yama has bowled a
‘bouncer’ out of the blue, but Shankaracharya responds to it with a flash of brilliance – he
plays a hook shot and despatches it for a six!”
Let us analyse the “hook shot” using the 3 criteria given above:
i) Subtlety
: The sense organs are an assemblage of sense objects. That makes the
senses effects of the objects, which means the senses are lower in the hierarchy than the
objects. The objects have to be considered subtler when seen in this manner!
ii) Vastness
: The sense objects are clearly far greater in number and size than the
senses. Besides, the sensory range of the stimuli they emit is vaster than that picked up by
the senses. X-rays for example cannot be seen, certain sounds cannot be heard.
iii) Immanence
: The sensory stimuli from the objects pervade the senses. Without
these stimuli from the objects, the senses would have no work to do. Hence the objects
form the core of the senses, and are thus subtler.
In this way Shankaracharya successfully handles the ‘bouncer’!
From Sense Objects to the Mind:
2
This is much easier and more conventional than the first explanation:
i) The Bhashya considers the Mind to be produced from the Tanmatras, whereas the
objects are produced from the gross elements. As a pot is a particular form of clay, so also,
the mind is a particular form of the Tanmatras. The mind’s subtlety is seen from this.
ii) The mind receives all the five perceptions from the objects via the sense organs. It
then knows what the object is. There is a seer – seen relationship between them. The seer is
always greater than the seen. The mind can see many objects – mind is one, objects are
many.
iii) The gross elements are produced from the Tanmatras, their cause. The cause is
always inside the effects. The third criterion is satisfied.
From Mind to the Intellect:
3
i) Mind is random thoughts, whereas the intellect is organized thoughts. This
shows that intellect is subtler.
ii) Intellect governs the mind. It produces the decisions for the mind to act upon. It
envisions a possibility; the mind cannot do that. Intellect is thus vaster than mind.
iii) The Antahkarana or inner equipment is one entity consisting of four subdivisions.
The intellect weighs all the thoughts contained in the mind and produces a decision from it.
The intellect is the innermost core of the inner instrument.
From Intellect to Mahat or Total Intellect:
4
i) and ii) The individual intellect is restricted in its operation to just one mind and
body system. The Mahat is the sum of all intellects. The individual intellect is a part of the
Total Intellect. Thus the Mahat is subtler and vaster. \
iii) The Total Intellect is the substance of which is made the individual intellect. Thus
the Total is at the inner core of every intellect.
This brings us to the end of 1.3.10, which deals with the Manifested creation. For the
Unmanifested level we go into 1.3.11.
From Total Intellect (Mahat) to the Unmanifest (Prakriti):
5
The cause of this manifested world is Prakriti. From Prakriti arises Hiranyagarbha or
Mahat. Hence, all the conditions necessary to prove that Prakriti is Param compared to
Mahat, are met. Prakriti is like the seed from which the whole banyan tree grows. It
contains all the potential powers for creation to take place. The Great Prakriti is Unmanifest
even to the mind and intellect, which in turn are unmanifest to the senses. Prakriti is the
Cause of the entire manifestation of the universe. It is also called Maya, Shakti, the Divine
Mother, Beeja, and Pradhana.
The word ‘Ota-Prota’ is used to describe the role of Prakriti. It means “warp and
woof” as in the textile industry. The entire universe is the warp and woof of Prakriti. This
well describes the vastness of Prakriti.
From the Unmanifested (Prakriti) to the Supreme Self (Parama Purusha):
6
Here we come to the ultimate Causeless cause of everything. The Purusha is the
subtlest level, the vastest and the innermost core of everything in creation.
7
Beyond it there is nothing. It is the Substratum of all objects created, gross or
subtle. The Self is the culmination of subtlety.
The Ultimate Reality
8
Our final resting place is not the cemetry, but the inner Self, the Ultimate Reality.
It would be absurd to think of something else equal to the Self. There cannot be two
Realities – it is illogical. A sect of Buddhism called Vijnanavadins attempted that by positing
Non-Existence beyond Existence. That led to enormous problems in logic such as “infinite
regression”, and ended in it being called Agnostic.
Causeless cause may be understood this way: Avyakta or Prakriti is the cause of
Hiranyagarbha and through it the entire Samashti Prapancha (universe). Prakriti gets
modified and produces various objects of creation, each different from the other. It may be
said to be their “modifying cause”. The Purusha is said to be the Cause of this cause
(Prakriti) in a totally different sense. It undergoes no modification Itself, but it supports all
that Prakriti produces. It is the Cause of all by being their substratum, while still remaining
totally pure and unaffected by the changes taking place in the universe.
A good simile for this is the snake and the rope. The rope stands for Brahman; the
snake for this manifested world. The rope is ‘vaster’ than the snake that is superimposed on
it. The rope pervades the snake, not vice versa. Hence, the rope is subtler than the snake,
vaster than it, and is its inner core.
The all-pervasiveness of Purusha is what gives it that name. It is such a unique
quality that ‘Purusha’ is the only term used in Vedic literature for It. This is unlike Prakriti
which has many names.
An Insight from Gurudev:
Regarding the triple criteria for determining a thing higher than another, Pujya
Gurudev gives a valuable insight into subtlety.
According to him subtlety can be measured by Pervasiveness
alone.
For example, there are solid, liquid and gaseous objects. Gas is the subtlest because
it will occupy all the space available to it; solid would be the least subtle. Pervasiveness itself
is measured by Pratyakatma or that which is the inner core of a thing, supporting it in the
outer environment. This insight relates all three of Shankaracharyaji’s criteria to each other,
placing them in the order of subtlety, pervasiveness and inner core.
*****
Next
1.3.12: Self Seen Only by Subtle Intellect
Continued
Comments
Post a Comment